31/10/2019 Level 5 Assessment grading criteria COURSEWORK 2019 15:58 L5 CW100-90%89-80%79-70%69-60%59-50%49-40%39-30%29-20%19-10%9-0%Coherence, organisation ofassignment and attention topurposeStrong logical organisationand coherence enhancesfulfilment of the assignmentobjectives and with somecreativity.Strong logical organisationand coherence enhancesfulfilment of the assignmentobjectives.Demonstrates logicalorganisation and coherence.Demonstrates sound,thoughtful organisation.Demonstrates generally sound,conventional organisation.Shows satisfactoryorganisation.Limited organisation that ispartially understandable.Poorly presented andstructured.Very disorganised.Incoherent.20%Clarity of expression (incl.accuracy, spelling, grammar,punctuation).Excellent writing styleappropriate to the assignment.Grammar and spellingaccurate.Fluent writing styleappropriate to the assignment.Grammar and spellingaccurate.Language fluent. Grammar andspelling accurate.Language generally fluent.Grammar and spelling mainlyaccurate.Meaning clear, but languagenot always fluent. Grammarand/or spelling contain errors.Generally understandable, butlanguage contains errors whichdetract from the argument.Meaning often unclear and/orfrequent errors in grammarand/or spelling.Meaning unclear and/orfrequent errors in grammarand/or spelling.Poor spelling, grammar andpunctuation.Exceptionally poor spelling,grammar and punctuation.Academic integrity. Honesty instudies; acknowledging andgiving credit to work ofothers; appropriate use ofreferencing standards fordisciplineSources used areacknowledged in the text andreference list. Referencing iscorrect and follows asystematic approachappropriate to the discipline.All elements of individualreferences are present.Sources used areacknowledged in the text andreference list Referencing iscorrect and appropriate to thediscipline. All elements ofindividual references arepresent.Sources used areacknowledged in the text andreference list and used tosupport discussion. Consistent,error free application ofrelevant referencingconventions with greatattention to detail.Sources used areacknowledged in the text andreference list. Consistentapplication of relevantreferencing conventionsappropriate to the disciplinewith occasionalinconsistencies.Attempts to follow systematicapproach to the citation ofsources, appropriate to thediscipline. Application ofrelevant referencingconventions with minorinconsistencies.Some attempt to cite sourcesin the text but containsinaccuracies, inconsistenciesand/or omissions. Generallycorrect application of relevantreferencing conventions withsome errors.Citations of sources in the textare inconsistent, inaccurateand/or incomplete. Limitedapplication of referencingconventions and/or errors.Citations of sources in the textare inaccurate and/orincomplete. Entries in thereference list are incompleteand/or absent.No acknowledgement ofsources of information in textand/or reference list.No acknowledgement ofsources of information in textand/or reference list.Attention to purpose /content and range ofknowledge and applied totaskAddresses the purpose of theassignment comprehensivelyand imaginatively.Demonstrates comprehensive,detailed and in-depthknowledge base, and a clearunderstanding of the limits toknowledge.Addresses the purpose of theassignment comprehensively.Demonstrates comprehensivedetailed and in-depthknowledge base, with anunderstanding of the limits toknowledge.Addresses the full purpose ofthe assignment effectively.Demonstrates a detailed,coherent, in-depth, knowledgebase, with a developingappreciation of theprovisional nature ofknowledge.Addresses the full purpose ofthe assignment effectively.Demonstrates a far-ranging,well-organised knowledgebase, and some appreciationof the limits of knowledge.Demonstrates a sound factualand/or conceptual knowledgebase and uses appropriateterminology.Evidence of adequateknowledge of topic and use ofappropriate terminology.Some relevant and/orrequired knowledge confusedor significant misuse ofterminology.Some relevant and/orrequired knowledge missingor confused and significantmisuse of terminology.Fails to address the assignmenttask. Little or no relevantknowledge included.Fails to address the assignmenttask. No relevant knowledgeincluded.40%Use of literature / evidence ofreadingEvidence of independentreading. Clear, accurate,systematic application ofquality material. Demonstratesa developing ability to criticallyappraise material.Evidence of independentreading from a balancedcombination of quality primaryand some secondary sources.Clear and accurate applicationof material.Evidence of independentreading from quality sources.Clear, accurate, systematicapplication of material.Evidence of independentreading from good qualitysources. Literatureappropriately applied.Evidence of some independentreading from appropriatesources and application ofliterature.Evidence of a narrow range ofreading from appropriatesources. Literature ispresented in a descriptive way.Limited evidence of reading orinappropriate sources usedand/or engagement with theliterature very superficial.Very limited evidence ofreading from appropriatesources.Little engagement withappropriate sources.No engagement withliterature.Synthesis: Informationgathering and processingDemonstrates an ability totransform abstractinformation, to construct newideas to meet the assessmentpurposeInformation and conceptspresented in an innovativeway to demonstate a fullunderstanding of the subject.Evidence of ability to utiliseinformation processingconcepts appropriate to thesubject.Information is organised usingappropriate structures andprocesses leading toidentification of concepts tomeet assessment purpose.Collects, collates andcategorises information in astructured way to meetassessment purposePartially collects, collates andcategorises information in anattempt to meet assessmentpurposeInformation organisation lacksstructure, hindering fulfilmentof assessment purpose.Information organisationdetracts from the assessmentpurpose.Limited organisation of ideas /informationNo organisation of information40%Analysis / Critical reasoningDemonstrates a highlydeveloped critical evaluationand analysis of subjectmaterial. Arguments are clear,coherent, credible anddemonstrate originality.Demonstrates a clear grasp ofanalysis with well-developed,critical evaluation of subjectmaterial. Arguments are clear,coherent and demonstratesome originality.Makes effective use of analysisto develop critical thinkingwhich is integrated into thework. Arguments demonstratethe ability to evaluate subjectmaterial.Analysis demonstrates criticalinsight and an ability tocontrast alternative positionswith reference to theory.Makes fair attempt at analysis,demonstrating conventionalcritical insight.Makes satisfactory attempt atanalysis with limited criticalinsight.Attempts at analysis withlimited evidence of criticalthinking.Attempts at analysisineffective. Incoherent criticalthinking.Lacks any analysis. Inadequateevidence of critical thinkingLacks any analysis. Noevidence of critical thought.Reflection / application topractice / conclusionCritical analysis of personaland others’ contributions andthe rationale leading to these.Demonstrates imaginativethinking about potentialalternatives and implicationsfor further practice in a rangeof contexts. Conclusions welldeveloped and analytical.Critically analyses personalcontribution and that ofothers to practice. Considersbarriers to developingappropriate plans of action.Conclusions well developed,showing critical insight withsuggestions of future actions.Analyses personalcontribution and that ofothers to practice throughreflection. Considers impact offuture actions. Conclusionswell developed, showinginsight drawn from the body ofthe work.Evaluates impact of personalcontribution and that ofothers to practice. Considersfuture actions. Conclusionsdeveloped logically in relationto content.Able to evaluate impact onpractice and that of othersusing a number of frames ofreference. Identifies somefurther actions. Soundconclusions clearly derivedfrom content.Able to interpret impact onpractice and that of others.Adequate conclusions aredrawn derived from contentLimited interpretation ofimpact on practice. Someunderstanding of theory.Limited conclusion drawn fromcontent.Ineffectual interpretation ofimpact on practice. Ineffectiveattempt to draw conclusionfrom the content.Incomplete interpretation ofpractice implications. Limitedattempt to draw conclusion.Inadequate interpretation ofpractice implications. Noconclusion.COHERENCE, ORGANISATION, ATTENTION TO ASSESSMENT PURPOSE AND ACADEMIC INTEGRITYCONTENT – KNOWLEDGE AND USE OF LITERATUREANALYSIS, SYNTHESIS, CONCLUSION AND APPLICATION TO PRACTICE
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
