ISE1000- Assignment 2 Marking Rubric ISE1000 S1, 2021 Assignment 2: STUDENT: ISE1000 assignment 2 Rubric v2.docx Total Mark __/100 Marker name: Marker comments: OVERVIEW/SYNTHESIS: /25HD (more than 22/25)A (between 19-22)B (between 16-19)C (between 12.5-16)F (less than 12.5)Demonstrates an excellent depth and breadth of understanding of Indigenous research methods to address social issues involving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communitiesDemonstrates a scholarly synthesis of the nominated issues with sources of literatures. Demonstrates academic originality with insightful connections between context and theoretical perspectiveDemonstrates a very sound level of understanding of Indigenous research methods to address social issues involving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communitiesSynthesises the issues with source literatures in a sound mannerDemonstrates extensive research and engagement with course material and contentGenerally demonstrates a sound understanding of Indigenous research methods to address social issues involving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities The issues discussed and the context are synthesised in a generally sound mannerDemonstrates sound research and engagement with course material and contentDemonstrates a basic understanding of Indigenous research methods to address social issues involving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities adequate engagement with course material and contentDemonstrates a basic/adequate level of researchDemonstrates a lack of understanding of the Indigenous research methods to address social issues involving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities Tends to demonstrate a lack of engagement with course content/materialsScant evidence of researchSTRUCTURE/ARGUMENT: /25HD (more than 22/25)A (between 19-22)B (between 16-19)C (between 12.5-16)F (less than 12.5)Very clear and concise introduction that examines and identify Indigenous knowledge through academic processes.Provides a very logical structure that examines contemporary political institutions and processes, polices and their ongoing and historical role in dispossession.Succinctly concludes and demonstrates how the argument has been shownProvides a solid introduction that examines and identify Indigenous knowledge through academic processes.Structure is coherent and logical and examines contemporary political institutions and processes, polices and their ongoing and historical role in dispossession.The conclusion clearly demonstrates how the argument has been shownProvides a sound introduction that examines and identify Indigenous knowledge through academic processes.Structure is generally coherent and logical, that examines contemporary political institutions and processes, polices and their ongoing and historical role in dispossession.The conclusion demonstrates how the argument has been shownProvides a basic introduction that examines and identify Indigenous knowledge through academic processes.Provides a basic argument statement that examines contemporary political institutions and processes, polices and their ongoing and historical role in dispossession.Has an adequate, identifiable structureConcludes in a basic manner without introducing new materialLacks a clear introduction that examines and identifies Indigenous knowledge through academic processes.Lacks a statement of argument/thesis/positionLacks a coherent structure, that examines contemporary political institutions and processes, polices and their ongoing and historical role in dispossession.Has no conclusion, or the conclusion does not follow, or the conclusion introduces new materialCONTENT/RELEVANCE: /25HD (more than 22/25)A (between 19-22)B (between 16-19)C (between 12.5-16)F (less than 12.5)Demonstrates a thorough contextualisation and analytical and analytical skills to evaluate the relationship between history and policy in an Indigenous Australian context. . The specific examples used enhance the essay and demonstrate scholarly research and originality through the connections madeDemonstrates a solid contextualisation and analytical skills to evaluate the relationship between history and policy in an Indigenous Australian context. . The material used is very relevant and confined to the topic Contextualises the effects of the topic and analytical skills to evaluate the relationship between history and policy in an Indigenous Australian context. . Material used is relevant to addressing the topic and sustaining the argumentAdequately contextualises and applies analytical skills to evaluate the relationship between history and policy in an Indigenous Australian context. . Most material used is relevant to addressing the topic and sustaining the argumentHas not contextualised or applied analytic skills to evaluate the relationship between history and policy in an Indigenous Australian context. . . Not referenced.Has included too much material not relevant to the questionACADEMIC LITERACY: /25HD (more than 22/25)A (between 19-22)B (between 16-19)C (between 12.5-16)F (less than 12.5)Shows a highly developed skill in articulating meaning.Sentences are structured in an organised, coherent and logical way Grammar and spelling are accurate and proofread.Referencing is accurate and consistentAppropriate word count, line spacing, margins and fontList of References attachedMeaning is always clear and unambiguous.Sentences are structured in an organised and logical way Grammar and spelling are accurate and proofreadReferencing is accurate and consistentAppropriate word count, line spacing, margins and fontList of References attachedMeaning is mostly clear.Sentences are generally structured organised and logicalGrammar and spelling are mostly accurate and proofreadReferencing is mostly accurate and consistent.Appropriate word count, line spacing, margins and fontList of References attachedMeaning is generally clear and unambiguous.Sentences have structure but some inconsistencies.Grammar and spelling are generally correct although proofreading not effective.Referencing is generally accurate.Appropriate word count, line spacing, margins and font;List of References attachedMeaning is not clear.Sentences are poorly structuredNumerous grammatical and spelling errors and proofreading is not evidentInconsistent and/or incorrect referencing style.Inappropriate word count, line spacing, margins or font;List of References not attached
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
