Course: Design Management for Engineers (ENGG 3007)Assessment: Continuous Assignment 1.1. – patent Application (25%)Course learning outcomes: CLO1.Demonstrate knowledge of engineering design management and apply the principles of economics andmarketing to sustainable engineering developments and operations.CLO2.Demonstrate a pro-active demeanour, professional and ethical conduct, and professional management anduse of information in an engineering context.CLO3.Explain the non-technical aspects of design projects, including innovation, economic, social, cultural, global, ethical, environmental, safety and legal factorsStudent Name:Marker Name: CriteriaOutstanding performance100-84Exceeds corerequirements74-65Meets core requirements64-50Does not meetrequirements49-0Format 8%The format of theapplication that is Title,Description, Claims,Abstract and Drawings(if appropriate) areprovided in correctorder. Professionalformatting (e.g.consistency in fronts,line spacing etc)The format of theapplication iscorrect and inorderThe applicationcontains thesecomponents: Title,Description,Claims, Abstractand Drawings (ifappropriate)The format isunacceptable – forexample, it mayhave missing parts,be poorly displayedor be incorrectlysequenced.Description40%Excellent descriptionprovided; Appropriatelength; materialsdescribed; functionalityof the product is clearand supported by clearlylabeled drawings/figureswhere appropriate.Novelty and efficiency ofthe product arehighlightedA good description isprovided andsupported bydrawings/figureswhere appropriate.length is appropriate,but could includemore details ofmaterials used/novelty/ efficiency ofthe productThe description andsupporting materialsare of averagequalityThe description ispoor; lack detailsand/or requires moresupporting materials(figures/ drawings)Claims 20%Appropriate number ofgood quality of claimsare provided. Claims areclear, concise andconsistent with thedescription; include allthe important features.Appropriatenumber of claimsare provided andconsistent with thedescription; all theimportant featuresare included. (3.5points)An appropriatenumber of claimsare provided andconsistent with thedescription;(2.5points)Claims are notappropriate, maycontain errors and/orare poorly statedand/ or may havemissing features(1 point)Abstract 12%Abstract highlights keypoints is an appropriatelength and structure.Readers can quicklyidentify the features ofinvention by reading thisabstractAbstract; highlightskey points, is anappropriate lengthand well expressed.The abstract is anadequate summaryof the main points.the abstract does notcontain the keypoints, is poorlysummarized anddifficult tounderstand; lack details/too muchdetailsGeneralwriting skills20%Well set out, easy toread. Correctparagraphing, spelling,tenses, etc.; concisewriting, well expressed.Good presentation,good paragraphing,may have minorspelling orgrammaticalerrors.AcceptablepresentationPoor presentation.No evident effort.Incorrectparagraphing, poorspelling, mixedtenses, etc.; writingunclear, expressionpoor, no spell orgrammar checkevident.Overall CommentsGrade:
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
