FV3004 Assignment Brief Assignment Details Essay: Typically, the court will appoint one fire investigator as an expert witness to investigate an incident and provide a report, as opposed to one fire investigator for each party (claimant and defendant). Discuss, with evidence and examples, the positive and negative aspects of this method. The word limit is 2,000 words (+/-10%). This excludes footnotes but includesquotations. The word count must be printed on the top right-hand corner of your work. Remember: You must keep to the word limit of 2,000 wordsYou must demonstrate that you have met the learning outcomesAs you construct and present your work, consider the assessment criteria Presentation Instructions It is your responsibility to ensure that your work is neatly and accurately presented. The work must be: Word-processedSingle sided1.5 or double line spacedAriel 12 point fontJustifiedPage numberedOn A4 paperMargins left and right 3cm Marks may be deducted for failure to follow these instructions. Please look at the Student Guide to Assessment for more information. Referencing All academic writing must be referenced. If you use other people’s ideas without referencing them you are plagiarising their work. Either: Use the Harvard system of referencing within your text. This will take the form: surname, year of publication, page number, and is enclosed within brackets, for example (Bradley 1998, 277). At the end of your work you should provide an alphabetical list of all the works you cite. Or: Use the Numeric System of referencing within your text. At every point in the text where a reference is made, insert a number (in brackets or superscript) and then list the references numerically at the end of your work, Plagiarism The use of work produced for another purpose by you, working alone or with others, must be acknowledged. Copying from the works of another person (including Internet sources) constitutes plagiarism, which is an offence within the University’s regulations. Brief quotations from the published or unpublished works of another person, suitably attributed, are acceptable. You must always use your own words except when using properly referenced quotations. You are advised when taking notes from books or other sources to make notes in your own words, in a selective and critical way. Submission Your work must be submitted electronically in either word or pdf format with cover sheet via Turnitin or by email from your UCLan email only. The deadline for submission is Every attempt will be made to ensure that the work will be marked and feedback available within 15 working days. The assignment is worth 40% of the total module assessment. Learning outcomes This assessment will test your ability to meet the learning outcomes as described in your module booklet, specifically: 1.Demonstrate the investigation methods for determining causes of fire and fire dynamics and the ability to apply these methods3.Identify and interpret char and burn patterns recognising the physical characteristics of arson fires and critically assess the evidence recovered and wanted by different agencies 4.Demonstrate fire investigation processes including the important roles and evidence associated with different fire safety agencies and personnel participating in fire investigation 5.Structure and present a valid scientific fact based fire investigation and critique a range of fire investigation reports from minor to major incidents Assessment Criteria Each of your assessments will be marked based on the following criteria: Marking CriteriaExplanationValueStructureFor example: Is the essay content introduced in the first paragraph? Is material summarised in the conclusion? Are paragraphs of an appropriate length and does each paragraph make a point?10%Coherence/LogicFor example: Is the essay coherent? Is the argument developed? Is the argument balanced?10%RelevanceFor example: Does the essay answer the question? Is all the material relevant? Is it clear why the information is relevant?10%Knowledge/ContentFor example: Does the essay demonstrate understanding? Are the ideas expressed in the student’s own words?20%Explanation of DetailsFor example: Is evidence used appropriately e.g. to support a point? Is the level of detail sufficient to support the point?20%ReferencingFor example: Are sources cited appropriately in the text? Is there a reference list? Does the reference list follow conventions?10%StyleFor example: Is the essay well-written, with few spelling and grammatical errors? Is it written in an academic style?10%OriginalityDoes the essay demonstrate independent thought, backed up with evidence from academically rigorous sources?10% For further guidance, see the provided assessment marking scheme at the end of this brief. ClassificationRelevanceKnowledgeConceptual understandingAnalysisStructureOriginalityPresentationOutstanding/ Excellent/Very Good 70-100%Directly relevant to the title; able to address the implications, assumptions and nuances of the titleMakes effective use of excellent knowledge and thorough understanding of the relevant materialThorough grasp of the underlying conceptsA very good analysis of the evidence, arguments or results, giving clear illuminating conclusionsCoherently and logically structured, making use of appropriate standard formatsDistinctive work showing independent thought and critical judgementVery well presented on good English and correct spelling and syntax; creative use of IT and inclusion of bibliography and clear instructive diagramsGood (above average) 60-69%Directly relevant to the titleA substantial knowledge and understanding of the relevant materialA grasp of most of the underlying conceptsGood analysis, clear and orderlyGenerally coherent and logical structureMay contain some distinctive or independent work and some evidence of critical judgementWell written, with good style, spelling and syntax, acceptable use of IT, diagrams and bibliographyAverage 50-59%Some attempt to address the title, may drift away from the title in the less focussed passagesAdequate knowledge of a fair range of the relevant material with intermittent evidence of understandingA superficial understanding of the concepts with indications of the students limitationsSome analytical treatment but may be prone to description or lacking in analytical purposeSome attempt at using a logical structure and/or standard formatSound work but showing no distinctive elements; conforming to standard patterns of approachCompetently written with only minor errors of spelling and syntax. Acceptable use of IT, diagrams and bibliographySatisfactory (below average) 40-49%Some significant degree of irrelevance to the title is commonBasic understanding of a limited range of materialLimited conceptual understandingLargely descriptive with little evidence of analytical skillA basic argument may be evident, but tends to lack clarityLargely derivative showing little originality of approachRather poorly written with numerous lapses of spelling and syntax; poor diagrams, use of IT and bibliographyBare minimal pass 40%Relevance to the title may be intermittent; the topic may be reduced to its vaguest and least challenging termsA limited understanding of a narrow range of materialAn understanding of only very simple concepts with conceptual gaps and misunderstandingsMainly descriptive with little analytical contentLittle evidence of a logical structureMostly derivativePoorly presented with numerous lapses of spelling, syntax and poor diagramsFail
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
