INF80025 Business Information Systems Analysis Assessment Task 2: Paper review and reflection – Comparison of Hard and Soft Business Systems Analysis and Design Methodologies Important details This task is worth 30% of your final mark. It is to be done individually. Your report should be between 2000 – 2500 words. Introduction The aim of this assignment is to demonstrate your understanding of hard and soft business system analysis and design Methodologies in an organisational context. The learning outcomes covered by this task include: 1 Critically evaluate the nature and characteristics of business information systems problems and their organisational contexts. 2 Demonstrate coherent and advanced knowledge of the major, contemporary organisational problem solving methodologies, and their applications to business analysis and business information system analysis. 3Critically analyse and evaluate contemporary issues and problems associated with information requirements analysis in an organisational context. The task This assignment involves the completion of comparison and discussion on various hard and soft business system analysis and design methodologies in an organizational context. The purpose is to enable students to demonstrate their understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of various methodologies, when and in what circumstances, these methodologies should be adopted. You can use the case study (Clinical Healthcare Inc.) which we used for assignments 1 & 3 as an example. This will require a critical analysis of established and emerging perspectives in the literature, and a synthesis which explains the current and likely emergent scenario for system thinking. It will also require both in-depth research using a range of resources (mainly, but not necessarily secondary in nature) and careful reflection of the findings. You should do the following: Read and summarize the key points of the following paper. You can find the full text via Swinburne database system: Bednar, P & Sadok, M 2015. ‘A Socio-technical toolbox for business systems analysis and design’. 1st International Workshop on Socio-Technical Perspective in IS Development (STPIS 2015), Stockholm, Sweden, June 9, 2015, In S. Kowalski, P. Bednar, & I. Bider (Eds.), Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1374, pp. 29-31). CEUR. You should summarizing methodologies we covered each week (from week 4). Critique each of these business systems analysis and design methodologies in the context of an evolving organizational environments. To complete this task you should:Provide a brief summary of what hard and soft system thinking means, and how to define hard and soft system problems/issues;Discuss how each methodology relates to solving hard or soft system problems/issues. To do this, you need to firstly read all relevant learning materials, then conduct a search to identify some relevant papers. You should list strengths and weaknesses of each methodology and discuss in which kind of situations these methodologies can be adopted.You should link to the case we used in assignments 1 & 3 and discuss which methodology or methodologies are best suited for the case situation. You should also link back to the above paper, the points made in the paper and provide some of your thoughts. Select the most relevant resources to complete the assignment.Present the review paper with suitable findings in standard academic format. Assessment The report will be assessed on the following criteria: CriteriaWeightingDetailsSummary of the paper15%Have the authors’ point of views been appropriately summarized? Summary of each methodology, Key features, strength and weaknesses15%Have the appropriate methodologies for business systems analysis and design been identified? Have the methodologies been clearly explained? Has the author demonstrated a good understanding of all key features, strength and weaknesses? Discuss how these methodologies link to soft and hard system thinking. How each methodology relates to solving hard or soft system problems/issues?20%Have the relationships or these methodologies and hard or soft systems thinking been clearly discussed? Are the arguments of each methodology been related to solving hard or soft system problems/issues?Compare and contrast these methodologies by using the case which we used in assignments 1 & 3. How your point of views on these methodologies to compare with the paper discussion?30%Have all methodologies been accurately discussed and linked to the case provided? Have the author clearly discussed his/her own understanding and point of views on which one or ones should be adopted in the case analysis? How well was the points argued for?References 10%Has the author demonstrated good research effort? Has the report used academic references? Are they properly quoted in the report? Are all sources referenced correctly and listed appropriately, both in the body of the report and reference section? (reference, not bibliography)Academic writing skill10%Does the report use plain English to make the text and content easier to read and understand? Has the report been spell-checked and proofread? Has the report met academic writing standards? Such as use of academic words, concise, no subjective opinion, well use references to support arguments…. Submission The report should be submitted to TurnItin via the appropriate link in Blackboard. Note that Blackboard and TurnItIn sometimes have outages beyond our control, so it is wise not to leave submission to the last minute – you can overwrite previous submissions. s Academic honesty The work submitted is to be the work of the individual only, and references must be made to the work of others. Students are referred to the Unit Outline for more details.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS