Leila loses her gold chain and locket. She is very distressed and places an advertisment in the local newspaper. Julie who has read the advertisment finds the locket and chain on her way home from the park. Realizing it is the lost items she goes directly to Leila’s house and claims the rewards. Leila refuses saying one should have telephoned first. Leila seeks one advice a. Is there a binding contract between Leila and Julie? b. Would the answer be different if Julie had not read the advertisement and is then told about the reward by April after she has found and returned the locket and chain?
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS