PBHl500 Master of Public Health

PBHl500 Master of Public Health
Assessment type Essay Word limit/length 1,500 Words (plus 500), including citations, references, tables, and figures Assignment overview This assignment focuses on the selection of reflective writing pieces relating to what constitutes ‘quality evidence’ and three new or improved pieces of quality evidence aligned with your standards of professional practice. Assignment details and structure 1. Assignment title 2. Reflection on your professional practice – a) Identify and reflect on evidence of achievement in own professional practice; b) Identify gaps in your evidence of professional practice that may contribute to your development as a healthcare professional/leader; c) Reflect on what constitutes quality evidence in your discipline and the best methods/practices to access this evidence (approx. 800 words). 3. Integration of quality evidence to improve your professional practice – Identify and choose three (3) of the professional standards that you do not currently have quality evidence for OR that you would like to improve your competency level in. With regard to each standard identified, reflect your professional practice and learning (3 reflections in total). Integrate relevant peer-reviewed literature to support your reflection. Make realistic and justified claims for how evidence of professional achievements, or future directions in professional development, meets an appropriate set of standards or competencies (approx. 800 words). 4. References (minimum of 5, preferably peer-reviewed sources from the last 5-10 years) Assignment 2 rubric Criterion (30) HD (>25) DI (23-25) CR (20-22) PA (15-19) Fail (<15) Reflection on professional practice (13%) - Identify and reflect on evidence of achievement in own professional practice - Identify gaps, in professional practice, for the development of future professional development/leadership capability - Demonstrate understanding, and reflective capability, of what constitutes ‘quality evidence’ of own professional practice All criteria met and clearly described. Most criteria met and well described. Criteria relatively met and described. Some criteria met and described. Criteria not met or described. Three (3) new pieces of ‘quality evidence’ (13%) - Provide evidence of professional learning and development against an established set of standards or competencies - Make realistic and justified claims for how evidence of professional achievements, or future directions in professional development, meets an appropriate set of standards or competencies All criteria met and clearly described. Most criteria met and well described. Criteria relatively met and described. Some criteria met and described. Criteria not met or described. Academic presentation and references (4%) - Clear, concise (word limit met), and reflective written expression in scholarly language - Correctly cited all sources of relevant literature in-text and– reference list based on APA 7th (minimum of 5 sources, preferably peer-reviewed, and no greater than 5-10 years old) All criteria met and clearly described. Most criteria met and well described. Criteria relatively met and described. Some criteria met and described. Criteria not met or described
Read less
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER
error: Content is protected !!