PRO100_Assessment 3_Brief Page 1 of 5 ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title PRO100 Information Systems Project Management Assessment Presentation Individual/Group Individual Length 7 minutes Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: c) Apply Project Management concepts to contemporary industry settings d) Effectively communicate solutions to unfamiliar problems in a teamsetting Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 6.2 (week 12) Weighting 35% Total Marks 100 marks Task Summary In this assessment, you will develop and deliver a presentation on Agile Management. Context: Agile software development is both an incremental and iterative software development methodology. A working understanding of Agile methodology is critical to IS project management. This group assessment requires you to present your understanding of an aspect of Agile methodology or a specific implementation of Agile (e.g. Scrum) and apply it to a real-life ISproject. Instructions: 1. Choose an implementation of Agile Software Development Methodology (‘Agile’), which includes: · Extreme Programming (XP); · Scrum; · Any other implementation of Agile. PRO100_Assessment 3_Brief Page 2 of 5 2. Conduct preliminary research into the chosen implementation of Agile. 3. Prepare and deliver a 7-minute PowerPoint presentation answering the following questions: Q1. What are the four values of the Agile manifesto? What is the meaning of each of these values? Q2. What are the twelve Agile manifesto principles? What is the meaning of each of these principles? Q3. Conduct a comparison between Agile and the traditional predictive model. In what aspects do they differ from each other? For example, their attitude towards changes in the project. Q4. Provide a detailed description of the chosen implementation of Agile. Explain why it is considered an implementation of Agile. Q5. Discuss the following statement. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it? Provide a clear standing and argue for your position. All IT projects should adopt Agile methodology. Waterfall methodology will lead to a much higher risk of failure once it is applied to an IT project. Length and layout of the presentation · The total presentation should be no more than 7 minutes. · There is no recommended number of slides. A suggested structure for the slides is outlined below: o Title (should include title of presentation and names and student ID); o Presentation purpose; o Presentation outline; o Body of the Presentation; o Conclusion; o References; o Questions and answers. At the start of the presentation, introduce yourself and the presentation title. PRO100_Assessment 3_Brief Page 3 of 5 Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here: http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing. Submission Instructions: 1. Submit ONE PowerPoint Presentation (.ppt or .pptx) via the Assessment 3 section found in the main navigation menu of the subject’s Blackboard site. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in MyGrades. PRO100_Assessment 3_Brief PRO100_Assessment 3_Brief_Final.Docx Page 4 of 5 Learning Rubric: Assessment Three Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Use of visual aids Visual aids support the spoken message. Use of colour, layout, clarity and neatness of visual aids. 10% No PowerPoint slides were used OR PowerPoint slides were occasionally appropriate and related to the spoken message. The slides require significant improvement in design, colour choice, layout and neatness. PowerPoint slides supported the presentation. They clarified and reinforced the spoken message. However, most content required clarity and improvement in design, layout and neatness. PowerPoint slides supported the presentation effectively. They clarified and reinforced the spoken message. They demonstrated an acceptable level of design and layout that supported the flow of information. PowerPoint slides were carefully prepared and supported the presentation effectively. They clarified and reinforced the spoken message. The visual aids added impact and interest to the presentation through the use of good design and layout to support the flowof information. PowerPoint slides were carefully prepared and supported the presentation effectively. They clarified and reinforced the spoken message. The PowerPoint slides had an excellent design and layout that supported the flow of information, and all of the required elements were well placed and clearly defined. Knowledge and understanding Understanding of the Agile methodology. Application and analysis of information to provide clear and effective solutions. 40% Lack of understanding of required concepts and knowledge of Agile methodology. Most of the key components were not addressed. Lack of application and analysis of information to provide clear and effective solutions. Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge of Agile methodology. Some of the key components are not addressed. Limited application and analysis to provide clear and effective solutions. Adequate knowledge or understanding of the required concepts of Agile methodology. A reasonable capacity to explain and apply relevant key concepts. It supported personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from research to provide clear and effective solutions. Thorough understanding of the required concepts of Agile methodology. All of the key components were presented. There was a good understanding of the concepts and ability to apply and analyse relevant information from the research/course materials and extended reading to provide clear and effective solutions. Highly developed understanding of the required concepts related to Agile methodology. All of the key components were well presented. Solutions were clearly justified based on the application and analysis of information from the research/course materials and extended reading. Effective Communic ation Ability to engage the Techniques used to engage audience were minimal, or mainly ineffective. Presenters Techniques used to engage audience were adequate. Presenters usually spoke clearly to ensure audience Techniques used to engage audience were effective. Presenters spoke clearly to ensure audience An interesting or original approach taken to the topic. Presenters spoke clearly and at a good pace to ensure An interesting or original approach taken to the topic. Presenters spoke clearly and at a good paceto PRO100_Assessment 3_Brief PRO100_Assessment 3_Brief_Final.Docx Page 5 of 5 audience Clarity, pace and fluency Clear and logical structure. 30% occasionally spoke clearly and at a good pace. Difficult to understand. Lack of logical and clear structure. comprehension. Delivery was usually fluent. Information, arguments and evidence were presented in a way that was not always clear and logical. comprehension. Delivery was fluent. Information and evidence were adequately presented with a mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. audience comprehension. Delivery was fluent. Information and evidence were well presented with clear and logical flow of ideas and arguments. ensure audience comprehension. Delivery was fluent and expressive. Expertly presented with a clear and logical flow of ideas, arguments and evidence. Use of academic and discipline conventions Spelling, grammar, sentence construction, appropriate use of credible resources. Correct citation of key resources using APA style of referencing. 20% Poorly written with errors in spelling and grammar. There was inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. There were mistakes in using the APA style. Written according to academic genre with accurate spelling, grammar and sentence construction. Demonstrated consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these were not always explicit or well developed. There were some mistakes in using APA style. Written according to academic genre. Demonstrated consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
