Unit learning outcomesDemonstrate the following knowledge and understandingDemonstrate a systematic understanding and critical appreciation of the interrelationship of diverse theories in the MBA toolkit to challenge existing preconceptions and develop positive and enquiring approaches to global management and enterprise. Demonstrate an aptitude and ability to solve a defined business problem through enquiry having drawn upon your MBA studies and appreciating the interrelated nature of organisations. Demonstrate the following skills and abilities Demonstrate intelligent practice by imaginative and critical integration of theory and practice to create a tangible deliverable through critical insightful evaluation stipulating areas of excellence and reflecting on areas for development to improve performance in contemporary organisations. Section Evaluation criteria SO Important Introduction Weight 10% A complete and thorough introduction with clear background information and statement of objectives with a comprehensive and persuasive rationale. Literature Review Weight 25% Evidence of critical evaluation of relevant literature and a convincing rationale. The review contains a reasonably wide variety of academically valid sources. Logical inferences leading to conceptual framework and research question present. A clear rationale for the research question, methodology explained. Research Methodology Weight 20% Evidence of an advanced awareness of the possibilities and limitations of the methodologies used and apply it soundly for robust data collection and analysis. Analysis/Discussions of findings and conclusions Weight 25% Evidence of robust analysis and judgement. Precise and persuasive arguments based on a firm foundation from the literature review, research methodology and data through to the conclusions constructed Coherence Weight 10% As for commendation with an additional flair and imagination. Cogent and clear statements reflecting findings and a statement of future direction. What am I required to do in this assignment?Your final assessment will be an individual managerial dissertation which will be a considered and comprehensive response to your research objectives agreed with your supervisor. Your dissertation will encapsulate your approach to the research, the research methods that you have deployed, an analysis of the knowledge generated as part of the investigative process and a reflection on your personal development as a consequence of this research project experience. It will need to demonstrate your understanding of the topic area in the context of contemporary academic theory, models and debate. Your dissertation will comprise a number of integrative elements all of which will contribute to the achievement of the learning outcomes for this unit. You will receive supervision and guidance through the process by regular communication and feedback on your progress by the tutor. Please see the “Your Study programme” section of the BREO unit site for detailed guidelines for writing each section of a dissertation.The main assessment and marking criteria are listed at the end of this assignment brief. Supervision Monitoring forms should be uploaded after each supervision meeting via the links provided on BREOWithout ethics approval from the university, you may not carry primary data collectionRaw Data along with documented evidence of data collection process should be submittedIf the report exceeds 10,000 words by a margin of more than 10%, the first part of the text up to the assignment limit only will be marked You should complete and submit the final dissertation to the relevant submission link via Assessment & Feedback on BREO by the deadline.Note: TurnItIn will be used for all submissions to check for plagiarism. We also reserve the right to initiate a viva voce examination if we have concerns regarding the originality of your submission. Viva’s will be scheduled within 15 calendar days of the assessment submission deadline. Invitations to attend a viva exam will be sent to your student email IDs. You need to be available for such an event following the submission of your dissertation.What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF)In order to PASS Assessment 2, you will need to: Demonstrate critical assessment of theories underpinning the aim and objectives of the project and integrate this understanding into a coherent framework for analysing case studies or other data/evidence. Develop a research design to identify and assemble sources of data and evidence and carry our data analysis as appropriate to achieve the aim and objectives. Demonstrate critical analysis and evaluation of case studies/evidence, debate the implications of the analysis and develop a tangible deliverable. How do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade?We will be filling this section in together in class on Click or tap to enter a date. make sure you have downloaded/printed out the Assignment Brief and bring it to the session with you. We suggest that you avoid writing in the first person (“I”); rather the third person is recommended (e.g. it can therefore be suggested that…). You may include headings and subtitles and a contents page if you feel this will help you to stay focused and create clearer sign-posting for the reader. Guide to writing the Project Report Section / Title Details / Guidance Title page Title of your report. Executive Summary Concise summary of your report, including aim, analysis, key conclusions and recommendations (comes first, written last) Contents Page Include page numbers. Introduction Introduction to the report setting out what the aims and objectives of the report are, the context, what the report will cover, why and your method of analysis. Must be supported by the ideas of influential contributors using in text citations. Methodology Justify the choice of your research methodology (e.g. primary or secondary) for data collection and analysis and design the approaches that best fit your research project. Consider any ethical issues considered and explain clearly your sources of information Literature Review You will need to draw on a wide range of recent (2010-2021) quality academic sources, including peer-reviewed material, combined with practical examples to support your arguments. You will need to critically evaluate the sources in relation to the application of theory to practice. A rationale for the research needs to be based on the literature review. Analysis You need to state and justify the method of analysis as appropriate to the aim and objectives of your project. If using systematic literature review you will need to present full details of the search(es) with number of results and inclusion/exclusion criteria resulting in the final sample of evidence for review. You need to present the evidence (data) published in quality academic sources. You need to analyse in-depth the evidence (data) and present the findings clearly. For systematic review and comparative analysis methods a table is useful to illustrate the findings. Word count for this section will depend on the topic of your project and may vary widely between projects Discussion In the discussion, you will need to interpret your findings with reference to theories introduced in the literature review. Apply the theory to the data, critically analyse and evaluate in-depth the effectiveness of theory in applied in practice. What is the unique insight from your research? Conclusions This section should initially answer the report aim and objectives and draw together the main points from your analysis. It summarises what has been learned from undertaking this project concerning the application of theory into practice. What are the main conclusions from your project? No new information should be presented in the conclusions. Recommendations Make recommendations for improvement based upon your conclusions, clearly stating how they can add value. Recommendations should be fully feasible and justified considering costs, priority level, timescale, resources, who is responsible, benefits and any further implications. Proposals should be actionable (‘immediately implementable’) not just a list of ideas. Reference List A list of all sources cited directly in the text using Harvard referencing style References/Bibliography – NOT OPTIONAL The references/bibliography should comprise a variety of sources used in the text, most of which should be academic journal articles. Other sources could include books, trade publications, news articles, industry reports, company websites etc. Harvard referencing style is expected Literature: Use academic source, i.e. books, journal articles etc. Refer to respected industry sources DO NOT overuse the Internet, do not use and / or quote from Wikipedia. Reminder: You are required to use proper in-text reference and the reference list in the end using the Harvard Referencing System. The writing: Try to approach this assignment in a logical and systematic way. Make sure you have a logical structure, a convincing argument, clear description of the situations which ‘set the scene’, and clear explanation which relate to theories, and a conclusion that draws your argument together. How does assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions? The first sessions will provide an insight into the tools that can be used to develop a proposal. Further help will be provided by local tutors during workshops to develop a bespoken approach.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS